Why the DA's continued participation in the GNU undermines voter trust and market stability

South Africa’s Democratic Alliance has long positioned itself as the party of accountability, market-friendly policies, and a real alternative to ANC dominance.

Yet its refusal to leave the Government of National Unity (GNU) after the 2024 elections reveals a troubling truth: the DA values blue lights and ministerial power far more than the trust of its voters and the stability of the markets it pledged to protect.

The GNU, formed after no party won an outright majority, brought together a coalition of smaller parties under ANC leadership- explicitly excluding the more radical EFF and MK Party. The DA, once a fierce critic of the ANC’s corruption and mismanagement, quickly signed on, insisting it could moderate government policy from within.

But what has this “moderation” looked like? Despite opposing key policies like the National Health Insurance scheme and radical economic interventions, the DA has remained firmly in government, lodging disputes but never withdrawing or resigning. By holding onto ministerial seats, the DA tacitly endorses policies that contradict its platform.

In doing so, the party betrays the very voters who turned to it for change and accountability. Many South Africans voted for the DA because they wanted a genuine alternative - a party willing to challenge the ANC’s failures head-on, not one that quietly enables them for the sake of political convenience.

At the same time, the DA’s continued participation in the GNU undermines market confidence. Investors and business leaders require clear and consistent signals that economic policies will safeguard property rights, maintain fiscal discipline, and foster growth. The DA’s silence and participation amidst controversial policy shifts send mixed messages that risk unsettling markets. This isn’t compromise -it’s capitulation. If the DA truly wants to rebuild trust and credibility, it must prioritise voters and markets over political power. Walking away from the GNU when fundamental values are compromised would show real leadership and restore its reputation as a principled opposition.

Until then, the DA risks being seen not as a force for change, but as another part of the political establishment that puts perks over people and blue lights over boldness.

** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.