Serial killer profiler Micki Pistorius is featured in the documentary, The Station Strangler which is expected to be streamed on Showmax in November. picture supplied
Ian-Malcom Rijsdijk
Between 1986 and 1994, the people of Mitchells Plain, Cape Town, lived with a terrifying shadow over their lives.
A killer was abducting young boys, often close to railway stations, raping and murdering them.
By early 1994, 22 bodies had been discovered across an extensive area of sand dunes.
Thirty years later, a Showmax documentary, The Station Strangler, investigates one of South Africa’s most notorious serial killings. It explores the feelings of loss, fear and anger still felt in the affected communities.
It also asks whether the man widely thought to be the killer – Norman Afzal Simons – is the Station Strangler at all.
As journalist Crystal Orderson explains in the film, Mitchells Plain was a mengelmoes (mix) of different language groups and classes spread across a number of suburbs. What they had in common was an origin in apartheid racial and spatial segregation.
From the 1950s, they were moved away from the city and the green slopes of Table Mountain, reserved for white people. Their new home was the Cape Flats.
This marginalisation of the city’s “coloured” people, along with the political violence of the 1980s, provided the perfect cover for a killer to go about his business. A co-ordinated investigation only started in the months leading up to the first democratic elections in 1994.
It was an opportunity for the National Party to make a play for the “coloured” vote by amplifying police efforts to find the killer.
In a particularly interesting interview, anti-apartheid activist and theologian Allan Boesak relates the horror of the killings to the violence of the apartheid state. He says: “We’d seen murder right through the 1980s but that was on the state’s side. A serial murderer like you only read about in the United States of America, that was not really something that we knew.”
As a film and TV scholar with a focus on crime procedurals, I am interested in the rise of true crime documentaries on streaming platforms.
What makes this film stand out is its focus on the communities affected by the crimes, seen through interviews with journalists and victims’ families.
Many serial killer cases involved the work of psychological profiler Micki Pistorius, whose career has produced several books. Earlier this year, Showmax released a drama series based on her first book, Catch Me A Killer.
The Station Strangler case was the first Pistorius worked on with the SAPS.
The Station Strangler contains many conventional aspects of the genre, but by placing the arrest of Simons very close to the start of the film, director Nadine Angel Cloete dispenses with the thrill of uncovering the killer.
Instead, she pivots to another trope of the genre, the miscarriage of justice. Is Norman Afzal Simons really the Station Strangler? This mood of scepticism is reinforced through an interview with Ruth Jakuja, a retired magistrate who questions the grounds on which Simons was convicted.
Numerous interviews contribute to Cloete’s narrative that the extended period of the killings was a product of apartheid spatial planning that pushed whole communities to the margin of the city. The children, some unidentified, were not only victims of the killer, but also of what writer Nathan Trantraal calls the state’s “legislated indifference”.
Ultimately, Simons was found guilty of only a single murder, that of Elroy van Rooyen. One journalist argues: “All the forensic evidence gathered in the case excludes Norman Simons as the Station Strangler.
“What led to his conviction was his muddled confession and eyewitness accounts from a police identity parade strongly criticised by experts.”
The film comes in the wake of Simons’s release from prison under strict parole conditions in 2023. While some family members express anger and fear over his relative freedom, a larger issue remains: what about the other 21 victims?
Has his release undermined the closure their families may have experienced when he was sentenced in 1995?
With doubts surrounding Simons’s guilt set against the confidence of those involved with the case who remain convinced they got their man, The Station Strangler rather grapples with what is incontrovertible: that a brutal killer preyed on the most vulnerable members of a community that was made even more vulnerable by the legislated indifference of the apartheid state.
*Rijsdijk is a Senior Lecturer in Film and Television Studies, UCT
www.theconversation.com
Related Topics: