The courts never asked Ramaphosa to ‘Show Us the Virus’; similarly they never asked him to show the CR17 bank statements, says the writer.
Ricardo Maarman
Is Ramaphosa subversive? Many suspect Phala Phala to be a scheme to “finance votes” at the upcoming ANC December conference.
Load shedding, to “facilitate opportunities” to privatise Eskom, for example, in his brother-in-law Patrice Motsepe’s hands.
What makes you think the Covid -19 lockdown was legit? Is it because the mainstream media told you so?
The same media that said Ramaphosa was too rich to be corrupt. Well, the lockdown was not legit, far from it!
I have been locked in a three-year legal saga, Maarman versus Ramaphosa, asking Ramaphosa to “Show Us the Virus”.
Before I explain what I mean, I am sure you can guess the outcome of the court battles against Ramaphosa, the mafia-like “Teflon Don”.
The courts never asked Ramaphosa to “Show Us the Virus”; similarly they never asked him to show the CR17 bank statements. Instead, the cases were dismissed with cost orders against me.
I made several public access to information requests from April 27, 2020, then filed a Constitutional Court case on February 26, 2021, and the latest on the November 21 this year at the Western Cape High Court.
Ramaphosa and EFF leader Julius Malema are untouchable in the courts. “Show Us the Virus” – what do I mean? How do you prove someone died of something? A post-mortem.
None has been done in South Africa or anywhere else, extracting the Sars-Cov-2 virus. This would have been valid proof of death by the virus.
How do you prove the cause of sickness? A biopsy. No biopsy has been done in South Africa or anywhere else extracting the virus.
This would have been valid proof of sickness by virus.
How do you use a test device to detect something? You calibrate the device with a pure exact sample of what you want to detect. The PCR test for Covid-19 has never been calibrated with a pure sample of the virus.
Bill Gates and the World Health Organization were dictating terms during the lockdown, to an ANC billionaire president whose CR17 bank statements remain sealed by the courts.
When Chris Hani warned about Codesa – that it was “capitulation” not freedom and that Ramaphosa was too close to Roelf Meyer for meaningful negotiations, Hani was silenced.
Ramaphosa’s lockdown “legally” cancelled the Bill of Rights and detained the entire nation without trial. He is too close to Big Pharma to guard South Africa’s interests.
The lockdown turned our “democracy” overnight into a dictatorship. I besieged the judiciary, Parliament and executive. I informed them that there was no valid proof of the existence of the virus, demanded they act in the national interest and in the interests of justice.
They dismissed me with contempt. They are responsible for the welfare of the nation and should have been concerned.
Because the mainstream media is compromised (present company excluded), the legal battle, Maarman vs Ramaphosa, has been raging for almost three years – a matter far more consequential than Phala Phala!
No valid proof of the existence of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was made public, yet millions were vaccinated. Millions lost their jobs and livelihoods.
Ramaphosa has a long subversive history. Since starting the National Union of Mineworkers on the lap of Oppenheimer, to negotiating Codesa hand in hand with Meyer, to calling for “concomitant” action in Marikana, being Jacob Zuma’s deputy for almost a decade, and now calling it “nine wasted years”, “buying the ANC presidency” and the lockdown, locking up the entire nation without trial.
Card-carrying ANC members have long lost the reins of power. Ramaphosa rules over them but he is not from among them, the lockdown proved it! If I am wrong, then Ramaphosa – Show Us the Virus!
Mr Maarman (MA) is a pioneering social activist, founder of the ShowUsTheVirus-Movement. He holds a BA degree in politics, philosophy and economics from Unisa and a masters degree in international relations/world order from the University of Leicester in the UK.
Cape Times
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL.
Related Topics: