Boerboel breeder fined R20 000 for illegal tail docking

THE NSPCA says the conviction of a Boerboel breeder for “tail docking” sets an important precedent, affirming that the physical alteration of animals for cosmetic or aesthetic purposes is unlawful and unacceptable.

Carlene Coetzee was convicted for the illegal maiming of animals in contravention of the Animals Protection Act (APA) 71 of 1962 and sentenced to a fine of R20,000 or, failing payment, ten months’ imprisonment, half of which is suspended for a period of five years on condition that she does not re-offend.

The NSPCA explained that in October 2023, Coetzee was issued with a warning regarding the maiming of animals at a dog show, after admitting to using rubber bands to remove the tails of puppies in her care. 

“The removal of an animal’s tail, commonly referred to as tail docking, is illegal under the APA unless performed for legitimate veterinary or therapeutic reasons to improve the animal’s welfare and comfort,” the organisation said. 

In January 2024, following information received that Coetzee had once again illegally maimed Boerboel puppies, the NSPCA’s Special Projects Unit obtained a warrant to enter her property.

“Upon execution of the warrant, Inspector Govender and the NSPCA’s Veterinary Consultant, Dr Bryce Marock, were initially obstructed from entering the premises in an apparent attempt to delay the inspection.

“Access was eventually gained, and during the subsequent search of the property, seven Boerboel puppies were discovered hidden in a wheelbarrow inside a garage. All seven puppies were found to have maimed tails.”

After almost two years of pursuing this case, the NSPCA welcomed the successful conviction. 

“Tail docking is a traumatic and painful procedure, often performed without anaesthesia. When carried out incorrectly, or for reasons other than legitimate veterinary treatment, it can result in severe and long-lasting complications, including infections, difficulties with defecation and urination, and nerve damage. It also limits a dog’s ability to communicate and express natural behaviours.

“Maiming cases are increasing at an alarming rate. The NSPCA believes this conviction serves a strong message to those who believe that tail maiming is necessary to serve ‘breed standards’ or comply with the human notion of what a dog should look like.”

Cape Times