News

Mchunu's chief of staff's contradictory statements leave MPs puzzled

Mayibongwe Maqhina|Published

Cedrick Nkabinde, chief of staff of suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, gave evidence at the parliamentary inquiry probing allegations of corruption in the criminal justice system.

Image: Photo : Armand Hough

WHILE the parliamentary inquiry investigating corruption allegations in the criminal justice adjourned to seek legal advice on how to deal with  Police Minister Senzo Mchunu’s chief of staff, Cedrick Nkabinde’s contradictory statements, the EFF lodged a criminal complaint against him. 

The perjury-related complaint was filed at the Cape Town Police Station on Thursday hours after committee chairperson Soviet Lekganyane said MPs were not in a position to continue with the hearing, given the quality of information that had been presented.

Nkabinde gave contradictory testimony that clashed with his affidavit to the inquiry and when grilled about specifics, he said he no longer had access to his devices and could not confirm certain information.

“The statement made by the witness that he did not have his gadgets is inexcusable,” Lekganyane said.

He also said Nkabinde could have confirmed dates with the ministry of police prior to attending the inquiry.

“I am convinced that there was no demonstrable intention on the part of the witness to be truthful with the committee.”

Nkabinde was testifying at the committee probing the explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi at a press conference on July 6. Mkhwanazi’s move was triggered by Mchunu issuing controversial directives, including the disbanding of the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT) to SAPS national commissioner Fannie Masemola on December 31, 2024.

In his affidavit, Nkabinde said he personally got to know Mchunu’s comrade and controversial North West businessman Brown Mogotsi in November last year when he facilitated a meeting at the request of Mchunu.

He said it was unfortunate that he could not be precise about the dates as his gadgets had been seized during a police raid on his property and that he was advised to provide dates as best as he could recall.

“It was an oversight on my side … The confusion is caused by me not having the gadgets,” he said, adding he thumb sucked the dates at some point .

But, ANC MP Xola Nqola said the matter had nothing to do with the seized gadgets.

EFF leader Julius Malema described Nkabinde as deliberately misleading the inquiry.

“This information written (on the affidavit) is not worth the paper it is written on,” he said before asking why the proceeding should go ahead in light of an affidavit that was thumb-suited.

Nkabinde insisted on blaming the contradictions in his evidence on the fact that his gadgets had been seized.

“I don’t have accurate information. If there are discrepancies in terms of dates, it’s because I don’t have help from my gadgets,” he said.

After some discussion by the committee, Lekganyane said: “It is a matter the legal team of Parliament will have to look at and if there is any consequence, they can advise us how to handle the matter of a witness who comes and misconducts himself the way he did.” 

He said Nkabinde should be ready to reappear before the committee within the next 10 days.

Cape Times